Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a

In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided October 12, 2001
287 A.D.2d 777; 731 N.Y.S.2d 400
In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a

Opinion of the Court

—Per Curiam.

Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in 1995, was suspended by this Court’s order dated June 15, 2000 for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a (273 AD2d 600).

Respondent has now complied with the registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and has paid the fees as required by this statute and rules of the Chief Administrative Judge. Petitioner does not object to respondent’s instant application for reinstatement.

Respondent’s application is granted and she is ordered reinstated, effective immediately.

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.