Whitehead v. District Attorney of Columbia County
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- Merritt v. Elmira Police Dept. Prop. Clerk (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2026)
- HCI Distribution, Inc. v. New York State Police (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- HCI Distribution, Inc. v. New York State Police (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- Best Sound & Security, Inc. v. New York City Police Department (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2005)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Connor, J.), entered October 17, 2000 in Greene County, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to compel respondent to return a certain motor vehicle seized by the State Police and for respondent to pay towing and storage charges.
Petitioner owns an automobile which was seized in October 1999 in connection with an attempted murder investigation in Columbia County. At issue on appeal is a judgment of Supreme Court (186 Misc 2d 372) which ordered respondent to return this vehicle to petitioner, primarily because the indictment pertaining to that investigation (three counts of assault in the second degree) had been dismissed by County Court. Finding, as we do, that Supreme Court erred in granting the petition, we now reverse.
As of the commencement of this proceeding, the criminal matter in which the vehicle had been seized had not yet terminated, even though the indictment had been dismissed (see, Matter of DeBellis v Property Clerk, 79 NY2d 49, 56). Indeed, this Court reinstated the indictment on appeal (see, People v Gray, 284 AD2d 664). Since that criminal proceeding is extant and petitioner’s automobile is potential evidence in the trial of that matter, Supreme Court erred in granting the petition (see, Matter of Marra v Hynes, 221 AD2d 539; see generally, Meegan v Tracy, 220 App Div 600; 23 NY Jur 2d, Conversion, and Action for Recovery of Chattel, § 104, at 422-425).
In light of this determination, we need not address respondent’s remaining contention in support of reversal.
Cardona, P. J., Peters, Spain and Mugglin, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.