Imperial Improvements, LLC v. Town of Wappinger Zoning Board of Appeals
Cases that cite this one
7 later published cases cite this decision.
- Wallkill Cemetery Ass'n v. Town of Wallkill Planning Board (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2010)
- Sherman v. Planning Board (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2011)
- Downes v. Town of Southampton Zoning Board of Appeals (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2005)
- Schaffer v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Harrison (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2005)
- Group for the South Fork, Inc. v. Planning Board (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2003)
- Hudson Valley Nursery, Inc. v. Planning Board (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2003)
- Dreikausen v. Zoning Board of Appeals (N.Y. 2002)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Planning Board of the Town of Wappinger dated April 17, 2000, which granted conditional site plan approval for the construction of a supermarket, and a determination of the Town of Wappinger Zoning Board of Appeals dated May 9, 2000, which granted area variances for the same project, the petitioner appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Pagones, J.), dated September 11, 2000, as dismissed the petition.
Motion by the respondent Martin’s Foods of South Burlington, Inc., to dismiss the appeal as academic.
Ordered that the motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.
The petitioner failed to move in the Supreme Court for a preliminary injunction to enjoin the construction of the subject supermarket. In addition, the petitioner failed to move in this Court for a preliminary injunction to preserve the status quo pending the determination of this appeal. Thus, the petitioner
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.