Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002

People v. Collins

People v. Collins
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided January 22, 2002
290 A.D.2d 513; 736 N.Y.S.2d 232; 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 487
People v. Collins

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Naro, J.), rendered February 10, 2000, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

*514Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s Batson challenge (see, Batson v Kentucky, 476 US 79) was properly denied since he failed to establish a prima facie case of discrimination. To establish a prima facie case, a defendant must demonstrate that members of a cognizable racial group have been excluded, and that there are facts and other relevant circumstances supporting an inference of impermissible discrimination (see, People v Childress, 81 NY2d 263, 266). The defendant failed to satisfy the second element. His assertion that the prosecutor struck a disproportionate number of black venirepersons was insufficient to establish a pattern of purposeful exclusion sufficient to raise an inference of discrimination (see, People v Childress, supra, at 267; People v White, 282 AD2d 628; People v Redish, 262 AD2d 664; People v Morla, 245 AD2d 468).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Altman, J.P., Feuerstein, O’Brien and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.