Williams v. State
Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Court of Claims (Silverman, J.), entered March 22, 2000, upon a decision of the court in favor of the State.
Resolution of the trial of the instant claim necessarily involved a determination of the credibility of claimant and Marcus. In this regard, it is axiomatic that where the trial court is called upon to resolve issues of credibility, we will defer to its findings and, unless its determination is unsupported by the record, we will not disturb it on appeal (see, e.g., Trendell v State of New York, 214 AD2d 887, 888-889). Our review of the record demonstrates that there is ample support for the Court of Claims’ determination, and the judgment, therefore, will not be disturbed. We have considered claimant’s remaining contentions and find them equally without merit.
Peters, Spain, Carpinello and Mugglin, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.