Wawrzynek v. New York State & Local Retirement System

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Comptroller which denied petitioner’s applications for disability retirement benefits and performance of duty disability retirement benefits.

Petitioner, a correction officer, filed applications for disability *628retirement benefits and performance of duty disability retirement benefits as the result of an injury to his back sustained during the course of his work. Based upon the medical evidence presented at a hearing, respondent Comptroller found that petitioner was not incapacitated for the performance of his duties and denied the applications. Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to review the determination, claiming that the Comptroller’s finding is not supported by substantial evidence.

Where, as here, the expert for respondent State and Local Retirement System provides an articulated, rational and fact-based opinion, founded upon a physical examination and review of relevant medical reports and records, the expert’s opinion generally will not be considered so lacking in foundation or rationality as to preclude the Comptroller from exercising the authority to evaluate conflicting medical opinions (see, Matter of Harper v McCall, 277 AD2d 589, 590). Accordingly, despite the contrary opinion expressed by petitioner’s expert, and despite petitioner’s criticisms of the opinions expressed by the Retirement System’s expert, there is no basis upon which to disturb the Comptroller’s finding that petitioner was not incapacitated for the performance of his duties (see, e.g., Matter of Daniels v McCall, 285 AD2d 723, 724). The determination is, therefore, confirmed.

Mercure, J.P., Spain, Carpinello and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.