Uher v. Toys "R" Us
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Lockhart v. Adirondack Transit Lines, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2003)
- Delacruz v. Galaxy Electronics (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2002)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Eerier, J.), entered October 12, 2000, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the defendant and against them dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiffs’ contention that the jury verdict should be set aside as inconsistent is unpreserved for appellate review, since they did not raise that issue before the jury was discharged (see Barry v Manglass, 55 NY2d 803, 806; Clements v Lindsey, 237 AD2d 557).
The plaintiffs’ remaining contentions are without merit. Santucci, J.P., Florio, O’Brien and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.