Guzman v. Safir
Cases that cite this one
8 later published cases cite this decision.
- Matter of Riverside Plaza Corp. v. New York City Dept. of Bldgs. (New York Supreme Court, New York County 2025)
- Matter of Mao Shoppe Corp. v. City of New York (New York Supreme Court, New York County 2024)
- Matter of Soto v. Shea (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2022)
- Matter of Soto v. Shea (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2022)
- Matter of Ramos v. O'Neill (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2022)
- Matter of Ramos v. O'Neill (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2022)
- Mulheren v. Board of Trustees (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2003)
- Deleston v. Safir (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2002)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Lippmann, J.), entered October 4, 2000, which denied the petition pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul the determination of respondent Board of Trustees of the Police Pension Fund denying petitioner’s application for an accidental disability retirement pension, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Supreme Court correctly ruled that respondent Board of Trustees’ determination, denying petitioner accidental disability retirement benefits as a consequence of a tie vote, was not arbitrary and capricious because there was some credible evidence to support the Board’s conclusion that petitioner’s disability was not caused by a service-related accident (see, Matter of Harris v Safir, 284 AD2d 220, 221). In reaching its determination, the Board of Trustees properly relied upon the medically supported recommendation of respondent Medical Board of the Police Pension Fund, that petitioner’s significant hearing loss in one ear was not precipitated by acoustic trauma attributable, to the discharge of a firearm proximate to her (see, Matter of Meyer v Board of Trustees, 90 NY2d 139, 147). Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Wallach and Marlow, JJ.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.