People v. Villar
Opinion of the Court
Judgment, Su
Defendant’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim involves matters of strategy and, in particular, defendant’s personal participation in certain strategic decisions, which cannot be reviewed on the existing record. On the record before us, we find that defendant received meaningful representation (see, People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708, 713-714). The record fails to support defendant’s claim that he was prejudiced by his trial counsel’s belated realization that defendant’s voice could be heard on a audiotape containing negotiations for the purchase of drugs by an undercover officer; we note that this tape was only a small portion of the People’s overwhelming proof. Furthermore, with respect to the argument that defense counsel permitted defendant to testify to facts that substantially conceded his guilt, we conclude that defendant’s testimony represented a reasonable, although unsuccessful, attempt to minimize his general involvement with the cooperating accomplice-witness and to distance himself from the charged sales. Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Buckley, Wallach and Lerner, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.