Sedita v. Verdi
Sedita v. Verdi
293 A.D.2d 665; 740 N.Y.S.2d 643; 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3903
Opinion of the Court
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries pursuant to the Dram Shop Act, the defendant Caffe Baci appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
There are issues of fact requiring the denial of summary judgment. Prudenti, P.J., Feuerstein, Friedmann and H. Miller, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.