Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002

People v. Lall

People v. Lall
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided April 22, 2002
293 A.D.2d 689; 740 N.Y.S.2d 639; 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3943
People v. Lall

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Blumenfeld, J.), rendered December 21, 1999, convicting him of criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree and unauthorized use of a vehicle in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the trial court properly denied his Batson challenge (see Batson v Kentucky, 476 US 79). The prosecutor advanced sufficient race-neutral reasons for exercising a peremptory challenge against the subject juror, and the burden then shifted to the defendant to prove that the peremptory challenge was used in a racially-discriminatory fashion (see People v Payne, 88 NY2d 172). The defendant failed to satisfy his burden of proving that the explanations given by the prosecutor were pretextual (see People v Payne, supra; People v Rose, 258 AD2d 483; People v Craig, 194 AD2d 687; see generally Hernandez v New York, 500 US 352, 364-365).

The defendant’s remaining contentions lack merit. S. Miller, J.P., Krausman, Goldstein and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.