Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002

Zurich-American Insurance v. Audiovox Corp.

Zurich-American Insurance v. Audiovox Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided May 16, 2002
294 A.D.2d 194; 741 N.Y.S.2d 692; 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5093
Zurich-American Insurance v. Audiovox Corp.

Cases that cite this one

5 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

—Orders and judgments (one paper each), Supreme Court, New York County (Helen Freedman, J.), entered January 8, 9 and 11, 2002, upon the parties’ respective motions for summary judgment, declaring in favor of insurers that they have no duty to defend defendant insured in the underlying proposed class actions, unanimously affirmed, with separate bills of costs. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered December 5, 2001, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed within the appeals from the orders and judgments.

The motion court correctly held that the underlying proposed class actions for which the insured, a distributor of cell phones, seeks a defense under its policies covering damages “because of’ or “for” “bodily injury” are not claims within the coverage of the policies. This is because such actions seek only economic damages measured by the cost of headphones that allegedly would block the allegedly dangerous radiation emitted by cell phones, and, while alleging the risk of physical harm, specifically disclaim seeking recovery for anything but the cost of the headphones. In view of the foregoing, it is unnecessary to address whether any of the policy exclusions apply. We have considered appellant’s other contentions and find them unavailing. Concur—Williams, P.J., Tom, Mazzarelli, Ellerin and Marlow, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.