Carrero v. New York City Housing Authority
Opinion of the Court
—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Gerald Esposito, J.), entered October 29, 2001, which,
An issue of fact exists as to whether Orange County voluntarily assumed a special duty to protect plaintiff from lead paint poisoning. Such issue is raised by evidence that Orange County’s inspector, without any medical training, before confirming whether the foster parents had remedied the lead contamination he had found in their home, and despite information that the child was seen eating paint chips off the highly contaminated front-porch floor, determined that plaintiffs high blood-lead level could not have been incurred in the foster parents’ home, and advised Orange County health authorities that the child could return there from the hospital (see, Bargy v Sienkiewicz, 207 AD2d 606, 609). An issue of fact also exists as to whether plaintiffs lead poisoning was caused by exposure to lead paint in the foster parents’ home. Such issue is raised by evidence that plaintiffs blood-lead level rose sharply within weeks after she first moved into that home, and then, after a short hospital stay, rose significantly again within weeks after she returned there. Concur—Saxe, J.P., Sullivan, Rubin and Friedman, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.