New York & Presbyterian Hospital v. Allstate Insurance
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- Mount Sinai Hospital v. Joan Service Corp. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2005)
- Mary Immaculate Hospital v. Allstate Insurance (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2004)
- New York Hospital Medical Center v. AIU Insurance (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2004)
- Damadian MRI in Garden City, P.C. v. Progressive Casualty Insurance (Civil Court of the City of New York 2003)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
—In an action, inter alia, to recover no-fault medical payments under four insurance contracts, the plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Parga, J.), dated May 14, 2001, as denied their motion for summary judgment and the defendant cross-appeals from so much of the same order as denied its cross motion to dismiss the complaint.
Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof denying the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and substituting therefor a provision granting that motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed, with costs to the plaintiffs, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, for further proceedings consistent herewith.
The Supreme Court erred in denying the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment. In opposition to the plaintiffs’ prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, the defendant failed to present sufficient evidence to raise a triable issue of fact as to the completeness of the hospital facility forms submitted by the plaintiffs in support of their no-fault insurance claims (see 11 NYCRR 65.15 [d] [6]), and as to the timeliness of the defendant’s verification and payment or denial procedures (see 11 NYCRR 65.15 [e] [2]; [g]; CPLR 3212 [b]; Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562).
Accordingly, the plaintiffs established their entitlement to medical payments as well as statutory interest and attorneys’ fees (see Insurance Law § 5106 [a]), and we remit the matter to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, for the appropriate calculations. Smith, J.P., O’Brien, H. Miller and Cozier, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.