Wheeler v. Goord
Opinion of the Court
Contrary to petitioner’s claim, we find that the determination is supported by substantial evidence. The correction officer who testified at the hearing stated that she received information from confidential sources that petitioner had taken the tape deck from the recreation supervisor’s office. The testimony provided by the confidential informants, whose reliability was adequately assessed by the Hearing Officer, confirmed the facts contained in the misbehavior report (see, Matter of Salahuddin v Selsky, 293 AD2d 900; Matter of Ruiz v Goord, 289 AD2d 810). Although petitioner denied taking the tape deck, this presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see, Matter of Jackson v Selsky, 288 AD2d 802; Matter of Santiago v Selsky, 288 AD2d 732). The fact that the tape deck was not found in petitioner’s possession does not negate his guilt of the charges.
Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Spain, Carpinello and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.