In re Fard Saleem G.
Cases that cite this one
10 later published cases cite this decision.
- In re Ayame O.-M. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2009)
- In re Albert R. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- In re Albert R. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- In re Megan L.G.H. Harlem Dowling-Westside Center for Children & Family Services (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- In re Megan L.G.H. Harlem Dowling-Westside Center for Children & Family Services (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2013)
- In re Chanteau M.R.W. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- In re Chanteau M.R.W. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- In re Shadazia W. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2008)
- In re Carolyn F. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2008)
- In re Aaron S. Orange County Department of Social Services (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2005)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
In an order dated November 30, 1999, the Family Court determined, inter alia, upon the appellant mother’s consent, that the child was permanently neglected by his mother and father. The court suspended the order until April 22, 2000, on condition, inter alia, that the father obtain housing, visit the child regularly, and attend therapy sessions. The mother, who was incarcerated, agreed that the father was the only resource for the child and that if he failed to comply her parental rights would be terminated. The father died in May 2000.
By amended order to show cause dated May 9, 2000, the Westchester County Department of Social Services moved, in
The admissions made by the mother in the initial neglect proceeding were sufficient to support the Family Court’s findings of permanent neglect (see Family Ct Act § 622; see also Matter of James Carton K, 235 AD2d 422; Matter of Noele D., 209 AD2d 828). Further, the evidence presented at the hearing supported the court’s findings, inter alia, that the mother had failed to satisfy the conditions of the suspended 1999 order of fact-finding and disposition and that the termination of her parental rights was in the best interests of the child (see Matter of Patricia O., 175 AD2d 870; Family Ct Act § 633).
It was unnecessary for the Family Court to determine whether the agency had exercised diligent efforts to strengthen the parental relationship (see Social Services Law § 384-b; Matter of Sheila G., 61 NY2d 368), as the mother admitted to permanent neglect (see Matter of James Carton K., supra; Matter of Patricia O., supra).
The mother’s remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J.P., Feuerstein, Smith and Adams, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.