Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002

Hyer v. Travelers Insurance

Hyer v. Travelers Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided September 23, 2002
297 A.D.2d 707; 747 N.Y.2d 393; 747 N.Y.S.2d 393; 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8674
Hyer v. Travelers Insurance

Opinion of the Court

*708The Supreme Court correctly concluded that the defendant met its “heavy burden” of proving “willful and avowed obstruction” on the part of its insured and thus was entitled to disclaim coverage based upon lack of cooperation (Thrasher v United States Liab. Ins. Co., 19 NY2d 159, 168; see State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v Imeri, 182 AD2d 683; cf. Physicians’ Reciprocal Insurers v Keller, 243 AD2d 547). In opposition thereto, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact sufficient to warrant denial of the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint (see State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v Imeri, supra; cf. Commercial Union Ins. Co. v Burr, 226 AD2d 416). Santucci, J.P., S. Miller, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.