Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002

Eagle Insurance v. Beauvil

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided September 23, 2002

297 A.D.2d 736; 747 N.Y.2d 774; 747 N.Y.S.2d 774; 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8658

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

Mercury Insurance Group v. Ocana (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2007)
Utica Mutual Insurance v. Colon (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2006)
Eagle Insurance v. Rodriguez (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2005)
Liberty Mutual Insurance v. McDonald (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2004)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

*737The petitioner established a prima facie case as to the existence of insurance coverage for the subject vehicle by producing the police accident report which contained the offending vehicle’s insurance code (see Matter of Centennial Ins. Co. v Capehart, 220 AD2d 499; Matter of Wausau Ins. Co. v Ramos, 151 AD2d 487). The appellant, the offending vehicle’s alleged carrier, submitted a letter stating in conclusory fashion that it did not insure the offending vehicle. This was insufficient to overcome the petitioner’s prima facie case (see Matter of Eagle Ins. Co. v Sadiq, 237 AD2d 605). The Supreme Court, therefore, properly permanently stayed uninsured motorist arbitration. Altman, J.P., S. Miller, McGinity, Schmidt and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.