Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002

Rosarky v. Rifkin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided September 30, 2002

297 A.D.2d 795; 748 N.Y.2d 64; 748 N.Y.S.2d 64; 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8942

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Porter v. Milhorat (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2003)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

The Supreme Court properly denied the appellant’s cross motion for summary judgment. After the appellant made out a prima facie case, the affirmations submitted by the plaintiff’s experts in opposition raised triable issues of fact (see CPLR 3212; Barone v Flynn, 284 AD2d 422, 423; Campea v Mitra, 267 AD2d 190, 191; Stepanian v Goldstein, 239 AD2d 569, 570; Taylor v St. Vincent’s Med. Ctr. of Richmond, 236 AD2d 461, 462; Licausie v North Shore Orthopedic Group, 232 AD2d 612, 613; Seidman v Booth Mem. Med. Ctr., 202 AD2d 490, 491; cf. Holbrook v United Hosp. Med. Ctr., 248 AD2d 358, 359). S. Miller, J.P., Crane, Cozier and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.