Nicholas v. Travis

The determination under review was made in accordance with the law and was not irrational (see Matter of Silmon v Travis, 95 NY2d 470, 476; Matter of Thomas v New York State Div. of Parole, 286 AD2d 393; Matter of Walker v Travis, 252 AD2d 360; Matter of Carrion v New York State Bd. of Parole, 210 AD2d 403).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J.P., Santucci, Goldstein and Mastro, JJ., concur.