Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002

McGibboney v. Greenberg

McGibboney v. Greenberg
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided September 30, 2002
297 A.D.2d 816; 748 N.Y.2d 869; 748 N.Y.S.2d 869; 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8967
McGibboney v. Greenberg

Opinion of the Court

“Because of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a court — in cases where judicial authority is challenged — acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers” (Matter of Holtzman v Goldman, 71 NY2d 564, 569; see Matter of Rush v Mordue, 68 NY2d 348, 352). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought. Altman, J.P., Plorio, Smith and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.