Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002

People v. Pizarro

People v. Pizarro
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided September 30, 2002
297 A.D.2d 826; 748 N.Y.2d 59; 748 N.Y.S.2d 59; 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8853
People v. Pizarro

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the People adduced legally sufficient evidence to disprove his justification defense beyond a reasonable doubt (see Penal Law § 35.15 [2] [a]; People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620). Moreover, the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Ritter, J.P., Krausman, McGinity and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.