Montgomery v. Goord
Opinion of the Court
Contrary to petitioner’s assertions, we find that substantial evidence supports the determination finding him guilty of the charged misconduct in the form of the detailed misbehavior report, the use-of-force report, the unusual incident report, a photograph of the weapon that was recovered at the scene and memoranda submitted by three correction officers who witnessed the events in question (see Matter of Krivoi v Selsky, 284 AD2d 677; Matter of Mojica v Goord, 262 AD2d 1002, Iv denied 94 NY2d 752, cert denied 529 US 1039). As substantial evidence supports the determination, it will not be disturbed.
Cardona, P.J., Peters, Spain, Rose and Kane, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Petitioner pleaded guilty to charges of fighting and refusing to obey a direct order; hence, that part of the determination finding him guilty of those charges is not in contention.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.