People v. Daughtry
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- People v. Smith (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2003)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Straus, J.), rendered
The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Issues of credibility were properly considered by the jury and there is no basis for disturbing its determinations (see People v Gaimari, 176 NY 84, 94). In rejecting defendant’s justification defense, the jury properly weighed conflicting accounts of the incident and was free to accept or reject any part of the testimony of each witness.
The court’s justification charge clearly instructed the jury as to the People’s burden of proof (see People v Coleman, 70 NY2d 817, 819).
We decline to invoke our interest of justice jurisdiction to dismiss the noninclusory concurrent count (see People v Spence, 290 AD2d 223, lv denied 98 NY2d 641; People v Kulakov, 278 AD2d 519, lv denied 96 NY2d 785). Concur — Williams, P.J., Nardelli, Mazzarelli, Marlow and Gonzalez, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.