Chatlos v. MONY Life Insurance
Cases that cite this one
5 later published cases cite this decision.
- Fiala v. Metropolitan Life Insurance (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2004)
- Ormond v. ANTHEM, INC. (District Court, S.D. Indiana 2011)
- Neurological Surgery, P.C. v. MLMIC Ins. Co. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2022)
- Volino v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company (District Court, S.D. New York 2022)
- ABN AMRO Bank, N.V. v. MBIA Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2011)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.), entered June 7, 2001, in an action by policyholders challenging the validity of acts taken under Insurance Law § 7312 to convert defendant insurance company from a mutual life insurer to a stock life insurer, dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Insofar as brought against the Superintendent of Insurance, plaintiffs’ claim, although brought in the form of a declaratory judgment action, merely challenges the Superintendent’s approval of the insurance company defendants’ demutualization plan as violative of Insurance Law § 7312, and was thus properly dismissed as barred by the four-month statute of limitations applicable to CPLR article 78 proceedings (see Butler v Wing, 275 AD2d 273, 276, lv denied 95 NY2d 770; Rosenthal v City of New York, 283 AD2d 156, 158, lv dismissed 97 NY2d 654). Insurance Law § 7312 (t) (1), which provides a one-year limitations period for any “action” challenging the validity of or arising out of acts taken under a demutualization plan, does not mention article 78 proceedings, and therefore should not be construed to provide a one-year limitations period alternative
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.