Noskin v. Noskin
Opinion of the Court
In an action, inter alia, to equitably distribute
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
Contrary to the appellant’s contention, under the circumstances presented here, the Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion in denying that branch of her motion which was for judgment in her favor for certain medical expenses (see Domestic Relations Law § 244).
The appellant’s remaining contention is without merit. Santucci, J.P., Smith, Goldstein, H. Miller and Mastro, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.