In re the Claim of Woodcock
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- In re Wood (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2005)
- In re the Claim of Alfaro (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2003)
- In re the Claim of Jackson (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2003)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 4, 2002, which denied claimant’s application to reopen a previous decision ruling that he was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.
Claimant appeals from a January 4, 2002 decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board which denied his December 5, 2001 application to reopen and reconsider an October 17, 2001 Board decision finding that he was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause. Claimant’s attempt to review this appeal on the merits of the October 17, 2001 decision is not properly before this Court since he failed to apply for reopening within 30 days of the Board’s decision (see Matter of McIntire [Commissioner of Labor], 284 AD2d 703). In any event, we find no reason to disturb the Board’s decision inasmuch as claimant alleges no abuse of
Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Carpinello, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.