Edwards v. Goord
Opinion of the Court
—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Next, we reject petitioner’s contention that the misbehavior report was not sufficiently detailed to adequately notify petitioner of the charges against him and enable him to prepare a defense. Although the reporter’s signature and preparation date appeared only on the Hearing Officer’s copy of the misbehavior report, such information appeared in the body of the misbehavior report. Moreover, the reporting officer testified at the hearing. Under these circumstances, we find that petitioner has failed to demonstrate any prejudice (see Matter of Alamin v New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs., 252 AD2d 824). Petitioner’s remaining contentions have been reviewed and found to be without merit.
Crew III, J.P.", Peters, Carpinello, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.