Miller v. Kerik
Opinion of the Court
Determination of respondent Commissioner, dated July 15, 2001, which found petitioner guilty of using excessive force and directed that he be suspended for 20 days without pay, unanimously confirmed, the
Substantial evidence (see 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 181), including the testimony of the complainant, supported the specification charging petitioner with using excessive force by striking a civilian in the nose while he was handcuffed. No basis exists to disturb respondent’s findings of credibility (see Matter of Berenhaus v Ward, 70 NY2d 436, 443-444). The penalty imposed does not shock our sense of fairness (see id. at 445; Matter of Hickey v Ward, 161 AD2d 495). Concur — Saxe, J.P., Buckley, Rosenberger, Lerner and Gonzales, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.