People v. Obee
Opinion of the Court
Appeal by the de
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
While police officers were attempting to gain access to the defendant’s apartment to arrest him in connection with a prior assault, one police officer encountered a woman who appeared on the scene. The woman claimed to reside with the defendant as his “live-in girlfriend.” She voluntarily consented to a search of the apartment which was to take place following the defendant’s arrest. In fact, she gave such consent on two occasions. The consent by this co-occupant of the apartment furnished justification for the ensuing warrantless search (see United States v Matlock, 415 US 164; People v Cosme, 48 NY2d 286; People v Garnsey, 288 AD2d 761; People v Fayton, 276 AD2d 339; People v Bostic, 222 AD2d 1073; People v Beriguette, 199 AD2d 515; People v Perez, 185 AD2d 330). Altman, J.P., Goldstein, McGinity and Mastro, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.