In re Klimow
Opinion of the Court
Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1966. He resides in California.
In December 1997, respondent pleaded guilty and was convicted in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona of violating 18 USC § 1001 (false statement), a felony offense. His federal conviction is essentially similar to an offense under Penal Law § 175.35, offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree, a class E felony (see Matter of Zumbo, 191 AD2d 805, lv denied 82 NY2d 653). We therefore grant petitioner’s motion for an order disbarring respondent and striking his name from the roll of attorneys pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (a) and (b) (see Matter of Johnston, 75 NY2d 403).
Spain, J.P., Carpinello, Mugglin, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that petitioner’s motion is granted and respondent’s application to voluntarily resign is denied; and it is further ordered that respondent is disbarred, and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law of the State of New York, effective immediately; and it is further
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.