People v. Vargas
Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a judgment of Oneida County Court (Dwyer, J.), entered Janu
It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice by reducing the sentence to a five-year determinate term of imprisonment and as modified the judgment is affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of burglary in the second degree (Penal Law § 140.25 [2]) and sentencing him as a second felony offender to an eight-year determinate term of imprisonment. Upon our review of the record, we modify the judgment as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice by reducing the sentence to a five-year determinate term of imprisonment. We have examined defendant’s remaining contentions and conclude that they are lacking in merit. Present — Pine, J.P., Wisner, Hurlbutt, Kehoe and Burns, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.