Wachter v. City of New York
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Chowdhury v. Phillips (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2003)
- Sewell v. New York City Housing Authority (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2003)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Lippmann, J.), entered on or about May 31, 2001, which denied plaintiffs motion to restore the action, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs,
As conceded by defendant City, plaintiffs pre-note of issue case should not have been struck from the calendar pursuant to CPLR 3404 (see Johnson v Sam Minskoff & Sons, 287 AD2d 233, 235), and, in view of that circumstance and the absence of any other ground for marking the case off the calendar, plaintiffs motion to restore should have been granted. Concur— Tom, J.P., Buckley, Friedman, Marlow and Gonzalez, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.