Martinez v. Royal-Pak Systems
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- Orellano v. 29 East 37th Street Realty Corp. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2004)
- St. Hilaire v. White (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2003)
- Kye Yong Kim v. 40th Associates (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2003)
- Sdregas v. City of New York (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2003)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barry Salman, J.), entered August 15, 2002, which, upon the parties’ respective motions to reargue a prior order setting aside the jury’s award of past lost earnings and directing a new trial thereon, dismissed the claim for past lost earnings as a matter of law, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiffs testimony as to his past earnings, unsubstantiated by tax returns, W-2 forms or other relevant documents, was insufficient, as a matter of law, to show any loss of past earnings (see DelValle v White Castle Sys., 277 AD2d 13; Razzaque v Krakow Taxi, 238 AD2d 161, 162; Gomez v City of New York, 260 AD2d 598). We have considered and rejected plaintiff’s other arguments. Concur — Tom, J.P., Andrias, Rosenberger, Friedman and Marlow, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.