M & T Mortgage Corp. v. Ethridge
Opinion of the Court
—In a mortgage foreclosure action, the defendant appeals, as limited by her brief, from (1) so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Mahon, J.), dated May 17, 2001, as granted the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, and (2) so much of an order of the same court, dated August 13, 2001, as, upon granting reargument, adhered to its original determination.
Ordered that the appeal from the order dated May 17, 2001, is dismissed, as that order was superseded by the order dated August 13, 2001, made upon reargument; and it is further,
Ordered that the order dated August 13, 2001, is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,
Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the plaintiff.
The Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. In support of its motion, the plaintiff established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a mat
Moreover, the appellant has failed to demonstrate how further discovery might reveal the existence of a triable issue of fact which would warrant the denial of summary judgment (see Castrol, Inc. v Parm Trading Co. of N.Y.C., 228 AD2d 633, 634).
The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Santucci, J.P., Krausman, Crane and Mastro, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.