People v. Stores
People v. Stores
300 A.D.2d 554; 752 N.Y.S.2d 549; 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12740
Opinion of the Court
—Appeal by the de
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the Supreme Court’s determination designating him a level three sex offender was supported by clear and convincing evidence, and thus should not be disturbed (see Correction Law § 168-n [3]; People v Wroten, 286 AD2d 189). Smith, J.P., O’Brien, Krausman and Rivera, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.