McCabe v. Town of Riverhead
Cases that cite this one
9 later published cases cite this decision.
- Nieves v. City of New York (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2023)
- Cornish v. City of Ithaca (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
- Cornish v. City of Ithaca (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2017)
- Doxey v. Freeport Union Free School District (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- Doxey v. Freeport Union Free School District (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- Martens v. County of Suffolk (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- Martens v. County of Suffolk (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- Pagano v. Town of Smithtown (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2010)
- Dalton v. City of Saratoga Springs (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2004)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The Town of Riverhead did not receive prior written notice of the sidewalk defect over which the plaintiff allegedly tripped and fell as required by the Town of Riverhead Code § 10-2. Contrary to the plaintiffs contentions, the two letters regarding the general deteriorated condition of the sidewalks in the downtown district did not sufficiently identify the particular defect which caused the plaintiff to fall and its location (see Hampton v Town of N. Hempstead, 298 AD2d 556 [2002]; Camenson v Town of N. Hempstead, 298 AD2d 543 [2002]; Gellos v Town of Hempstead, 284 AD2d 370 [2001]; James v City of New Rochelle, 282 AD2d 503, 505 [2001]). Furthermore, notice of one isolated sidewalk defect in front of property adjoining the subject property more than two years before this accident did not, without more, qualify as notice of the particular sidewalk defect in front of the subject property (see Jones v Town of Brookhaven, 227 AD2d 530 [1996]). Ritter, J.P., Smith, Friedmann, H. Miller and Crane, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.