Cooper v. Hempstead General Hospital
Cases that cite this one
9 later published cases cite this decision.
- Yong Hong Xie v. Lan Chen (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2026)
- Martello v. Martello (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- Matter of Ruth S. (Sharon S.) (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2015)
- Born to Build, LLC v. Saleh (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- Born to Build, LLC v. Saleh (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- Peralta v. All Weather Tire Sales & Service, Inc. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2009)
- Hannigan v. Hannigan (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2008)
- Chiarello v. Alessandro (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2007)
- Maury v. Maury (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2004)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, etc.,
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
Contrary to the appellants’ contention, the Supreme Court properly refused to vacate a stipulation of settlement entered into in open court pursuant to which the appellants settled their claims with all but one defendant. It is well settled that stipulations of settlement are judicially favored and should not be lightly set aside (see Matter of Byrne v Nassau County Bd. of Elections, 307 AD2d 1053 [2003]). In addition, the appellants’ former attorneys had apparent authority to enter into the stipulation and the appellants waited approximately 17 months before they sought to vacate the stipulation (see Hallock v State of New York, 64 NY2d 224 [1984]; Bubeck v Main Urology Assoc., 275 AD2d 909 [2000]; Matter of Bouloy v Peters, 262 AD2d 209, 210 [1999]; Ryerson v Ryerson, 208 AD2d 914 [1994]; Swanson v Bryant, 160 AD2d 999, 1001 [1990]).
The appellants’ remaining contention is without merit. Florio, J.P., Friedmann, Townes and Cozier, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.