People v. Freeman
Opinion of the Court
Appeal by the de
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant has not preserved for appellate review his contention that the County Court improperly resentenced him on his violation of probation because it failed to obtain an updated presentence report (see People v Segar, 295 AD2d 628 [2002]; People v Pierre-Paul, 289 AD2d 262 [2001]; People v Viruet, 288 AD2d 407 [2001]).
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Altman, J.P., S. Miller, McGinity, Adams and Mastro, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.