People v. Liggins
Cases that cite this one
12 later published cases cite this decision.
- People v. Rayford (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2023)
- JAMES, NANCY, PEOPLE v (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- People v. James (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- People v. James (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2016)
- WERTMAN, ADAM M., PEOPLE v (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- People v. Wertman (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- People v. Wertman (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2014)
- DOUGLAS, CAMILLO, PEOPLE v (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2011)
- People v. Douglas (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2011)
- People v. Winchell (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2007)
- People v. Owens (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2006)
- People v. Bowen (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2005)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by reversing those parts convicting defendant of two counts of assault in the second degree and vacating the sentences imposed thereon and as modified the judgment is affirmed, and a new trial is granted on counts one and two of the indictment.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him after a jury trial of two counts of assault in the second degree (Penal Law § 120.05 [3], [7]) and one count of criminal mischief in the fourth degree (§ 145.00 [1]>. Contrary to the contention of defendant, the testimony of the victim is legally sufficient to establish that he sustained a physical injury within the meaning of Penal Law § 10.00 (9). The victim testified that he experienced shock-like pain in his head when defendant “head-butted” him, that his lips and mouth bled for 20 to 30 minutes, that four of his front teeth were loosened for a week, and that he had to avoid solid food and take pain medication for a week (see People v Marsh, 264 AD2d 647 [1999], lv denied 94 NY2d 825 [1999]; Matter of O’Shanna T., 238 AD2d 287 [1997]; see also People v Porter, 305 AD2d 933 [2003], lv denied 100 NY2d 586 [2003]; People v Jackson, 296 AD2d 313 [2002], lv denied 98 NY2d 768 [2002]). Also contrary to defendant’s contention, the testimony that defendant tore a metal heater cover from a wall and swung it around the cell to bang it against other objects is legally sufficient to establish that defendant intended to damage the heater cover (see People v Gianni, 303 AD2d 1012 [2003], lv denied 100 NY2d 581 [2003]; People v Price, 2003 NY Slip Op 51250[U]). We agree with defendant, however, that County Court erred in denying his request for a
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.