Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003

Miller v. De Maro

Miller v. De Maro
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided November 3, 2003
1 A.D.2d 363; 766 N.Y.S.2d 584; 1 A.D.3d 363; 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11514
Miller v. De Maro

Opinion of the Court

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus, inter alia, to *364compel the respondent to reinstate the complaint in an action entitled Miller v Radder, in the Supreme Court, Nassau County, under Index No. 8837/02.

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act and only when there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought {see Matter of Legal Aid Socy. of Sullivan County v Scheinman, 53 NY2d 12, 16 [1981]). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought. Santucci, J.E, Friedmann, McGinity and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.