People v. Ortiz
Opinion of the Court
—Judgment, Supreme
The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s determinations concerning credibility. Evidence properly credited by the jury clearly warranted the inference that defendant damaged the vehicle by breaking its window (see People v Wachowicz, 22 NY2d 369; People v Jordan, 277 AD2d 155, lv denied 96 NY2d 760). Concur — Tom, J.P., Buckley, Rosenberger, Friedman and Marlow, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.