Krakauer v. Stuyvesant Owners, Inc.
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Dunnegan v. 220 East 54th Street Owners, Inc. (District Court, S.D. New York 2021)
- Bregman v. 111 Tenants Corp. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
- Bregman v. 111 Tenants Corp. (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2012)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Leland DeGrasse, J.), entered December 14, 2001, which denied plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment and class certification and granted
Contrary to plaintiffs argument, the inclusion of the preferential subleasing provision in the proprietary lease, although violative of Business Corporation Law § 501 (c) (see Lescht v Concord Vil. Owners Corp., 261 AD2d 449; Wapnick v Seven Park Ave. Corp., 240 AD2d 245), did not effectively divest defendant residential cooperative corporation of its basic, underlying prerogative, unambiguously set forth elsewhere in the proprietary lease, to regulate subtenancies (see Susser v 200 E. 36th Owners Corp., 262 AD2d 197). Accordingly, the motion court properly invalidated only the provision according preferential rights, leaving the corporation’s authority with respect to the regulation of subtenancies otherwise intact.
We have considered plaintiffs remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Sullivan, Williams and Gonzalez, JJ.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.