Verboys v. Town of Ramapo
Opinion of the Court
—In an
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
After the respondents made out a prima facie case for summary judgment, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact that the respondents may be held liable for malicious prosecution (see Smith-Hunter v Harvey, 95 NY2d 191; Hopkinson v Lehigh Val. R.R. Co., 249 NY 296; Goddard v Daly, 295 AD2d 314; Quigley v City of Auburn, 267 AD2d 978; Viza v Town of Greece, 94 AD2d 965).
The plaintiffs’ remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J.P., Luciano, Cozier and Rivera, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.