In re the Claim of Jimenez
Cases that cite this one
4 later published cases cite this decision.
- In re the Claim of Garrett (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2009)
- In re the Claim of Glowinski (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2004)
- In re the Claim of Iskhakov (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2004)
- In re June (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 2003)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 17, 2001, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Claimant was discharged from his employment as a tailor and co-manager of a clothing store after he failed to abide by the employer’s absentee policy of calling in prior to the beginning of his shift. The employer’s witness testified that claimant was informed at monthly meetings that the employer must be notified of absences at least a half hour prior to the beginning of the shift. Here, claimant failed to call in sick to work until several hours after his shift began. Under these circumstances, substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemploy
Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.