Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003

Gray v. Grosso

Gray v. Grosso
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Decided February 3, 2003
302 A.D.2d 387; 754 N.Y.S.2d 574; 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 783
Gray v. Grosso

Opinion of the Court

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition, inter alia, to prohibit the prosecution of Queens County Indictment Nos. 69/01 and 1942/01, and application for poor person relief.

Ordered that the application for poor person relief is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

“Because of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a court — in cases where judicial authority is challenged — acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers” (Matter of Holtzman v Goldman, 71 NY2d 564, 569; see, Matter of Rush v Mordue, 68 NY2d 348, 352). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought. Feuerstein, J.P., O’Brien, McGinity and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.