People v. Thomas
Opinion of the Court
Appeal by the de
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the trial court properly denied her Batson motion (see Batson v Kentucky, 476 US 79 [1986]) since she failed to make a prima facie showing of discrimination (see People v Blackford, 256 AD2d 619, 620 [1998]). The prosecutor’s exercise of a peremptory challenge against one black prospective juror fails, without more, to establish a Batson violation (see People v Cousin, 272 AD2d 477, 478 [2000]; People v Hinton, 285 AD2d 476 [2001]; People v Blackford, supra).
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]).
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).
The defendant’s remaining contentions either are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Krausman, J.P., Schmidt, Crane and Rivera, JJ., concur.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.