People v. Peters
Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a
It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of burglary in the second degree (Penal Law ยง 140.25 [2]). Contrary to the contention of defendant, County Court was not required to hold a hearing on his motion to withdraw the guilty plea where, as here, the court afforded defendant a reasonable opportunity to advance his contentions in support of the motion (see People v Rivera, 258 AD2d 426, lv denied 93 NY2d 1005; People v Chrysler, 241 AD2d 975, lv denied 90 NY2d 1010). The court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. Defendant knowingly and voluntarily entered into a favorable plea agreement, and his subsequent bare assertions of innocence in support of the motion are insufficient to require vacatur of the plea (see People v Patterson, 295 AD2d 966; People v French, 292 AD2d 813, 814, lv denied 98 NY2d 675). Present โ Green, J.P., Hurlbutt, Burns, Gorski and Hayes, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.