In re the Arbitration between Nationwide Insurance Enterprise & Denga
Opinion of the Court
Appeal from an order of Supreme Court, Erie County (Michalek, J.), entered December 21, 2001, which, inter alia, denied respondent’s cross motion to dismiss the petition.
Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 seeking a stay of arbitration. Supreme Court erred in denying respondent’s cross motion to dismiss the petition. Petitioner’s failure to specify a return date in the notice of petition as required by CPLR 403 (a) constitutes a jurisdictional defect that requires dismissal of this proceeding (see Matter of Figaro v New York State & Local Retirement Sys., 203 AD2d 678, lv denied 84 NY2d 801). In any event, respondent also is entitled to dismissal because petitioner’s service of the notice of petition and petition by ordinary mail constitutes a further jurisdictional defect (see CPLR 7503 [c]; Rodriguez v Allstate Ins. Co., 180 Misc 2d 969, 972-973). Present — Pine, J.P., Wisner, Kehoe, Burns and Gorski, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.