Chassen v. Chatsworth, LLC
Opinion of the Court
Order and judg
Plaintiff, a proprietary lessee of 20 apartments in the subject building during the time the building was owned by a residential cooperative corporation, sought a declaration that he was entitled to possess and sublease the apartments notwithstanding the building’s transfer to defendant-respondent’s ownership as a consequence of the foreclosure of the mortgage upon the premises. The relief sought by plaintiff was correctly denied and a declaration properly made in defendant-respondent’s favor. Pursuant to the December 2000 amendment to the Rent Stabilization Code (9 NYCRR 2520.11 [Z] [1]), “where cooperative or condominium ownership of such building no longer exists (deconversion), because the cooperative corporation or condominium association loses title to the building upon a foreclosure of the underlying mortgage or otherwise, * * * such housing accommodations shall revert to regulation pursuant to the [Rent Stabilization Law] and this Code.” Under rent stabilization, plaintiff, who has never occupied any of the units at issue as a primary residence, is not entitled to possession of or to sublet the units (see 9 NYCRR 2520.11 [Z] [1] [i] [d] [3]; 2525.6 [a]; Real Property Law § 226-b). Because the December 2000 amendment to the Rent Stabilization Code was remedial, the motion court properly applied it retroactively (see Matter of Unicorn Devs. v Commissioner of Labor of State of N.Y., 190 AD2d 807, 809 [1993]).
We have considered plaintiffs remaining arguments and find them unavailing. Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Buckley, Rosenberger and Marlow, JJ.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.